<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Complexities of Style</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.niblettes.com/blog/2006/12/12/the-complexities-of-style/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.niblettes.com/blog/2006/12/12/the-complexities-of-style/</link>
	<description>Tasty Little Nuggets of Design and Innovation Goodness</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 20 Nov 2008 12:32:05 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: niblettes</title>
		<link>http://www.niblettes.com/blog/2006/12/12/the-complexities-of-style/#comment-7632</link>
		<dc:creator>niblettes</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Dec 2006 18:45:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.niblettes.com/blog/2006/12/12/the-complexities-of-style/#comment-7632</guid>
		<description>I've always found it interesting how polish seems to hinder conversation.  When a sketch is too polished, too finished looking, the dialog seems to assume the design work closed.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve always found it interesting how polish seems to hinder conversation.  When a sketch is too polished, too finished looking, the dialog seems to assume the design work closed.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jim Rait</title>
		<link>http://www.niblettes.com/blog/2006/12/12/the-complexities-of-style/#comment-7592</link>
		<dc:creator>Jim Rait</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Dec 2006 09:54:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.niblettes.com/blog/2006/12/12/the-complexities-of-style/#comment-7592</guid>
		<description>Aesthetics vs. function! Looks too finished to be bottom-up; maybe a corporate dept could legislate this as the way forward This site http://www.senteco.com shows some great ways of bottom -up ways of capturing the knowledge of complex processes as they are built up by the participants who have to use them afterwards. It is the appearance of the diagrams (finished to unfinished) that invites or not people to particapate... use the building blocks to build pathways or delivering them as barriers!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Aesthetics vs. function! Looks too finished to be bottom-up; maybe a corporate dept could legislate this as the way forward This site <a href="http://www.senteco.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.senteco.com</a> shows some great ways of bottom -up ways of capturing the knowledge of complex processes as they are built up by the participants who have to use them afterwards. It is the appearance of the diagrams (finished to unfinished) that invites or not people to particapate&#8230; use the building blocks to build pathways or delivering them as barriers!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
